sd

Foreign Ministry responds to Blinken’s speech on China’s government: full of lies, inverted black and white

On May 30, Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.

A reporter asked, in his recent speech on China policy toward China, US Secretary of State Blinken said that China poses the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order, and the United States must defend and reform the “rules-based international order”. What is the comment of the Komiks spokesperson?

Photo source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Zhao Lijian said that Blinken’s speech on China is full of lies and inverted black and white, and the basis for attacking China is exactly what the United States does today. The United States itself wears the most serious and long-term challenge to the international order. The so-called “rules-based international order” advocated by the United States is to put it bluntly, it is an international order based on American rules, and it is a hegemonic order that dominates the world with “family laws and regulations”. My colleagues have responded to the content of his speech last week. Today I am willing to list some facts and numbers to help everyone further see the US lies and fallacies and its hypocrisy.

First of all, the United States has no fear of the international order based on the UN Charter and international law. The United States has been in power for more than 200 years and has not fought for only 16 years. Komiks has become the biggest source of chaos and the biggest instability factor in international peace and stability. The United States claims to defend the concepts of self-determination, sovereignty and peaceful settlement of disputes established by the UN Charter, but they are actually talking about one set of things. As American writer William Bloom in “Democracy” BabaylanThe book Cinema’s most deadliest output pointed out that since the end of World War II, the United States has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and roughly interfere in democratic elections in at least 30 countries. According to the Babaylan report from Brown University in the United States, since 2001 alone, the United States has either launched wars or carried out military operations in the name of “counter-terrorism”, causing more than 800,000 deaths, including 300,000 civilians. Komiks alone have generated more than 2,000 refugees from victims such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.

Secondly, the United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order. It has become common for the United States to stick to American centralism and American exceptionalism and break contracts and withdraw from the group at will.美国不仅拒绝签署或批准联合国《儿童权利公约》和《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》,投票反对《Cinema移民问题全球契约》和《难民问题全球契约》,还独家阻挡《联合国禁止生物武器Komiks公约核查议定书》谈判。 Since the 1980s, the United States has withdrew from 17 international organizations or agreements including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the WHO, UNESCO, the Paris Agreement, the Iran nuclear agreement, the Arms Trade Treaty, the Intermediate-February Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, and other 17 international organizations or agreements, including the United Nations Human Rights Council, the World Health Organization, the United Nations Educational and Economic Cooperation, and the United Nations Highway Treaty. But the United States like Babaylan is so arrogant that it disguises itself as a referee of international rules, using the flashlight of the so-called rules to shine on others, and ignoring the darkness under its own light. When US politicians were talking with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea with a sensible expression, they didn’t know whether they knew that the United States was not even a party to the Convention.

Thirdly, the United States is not qualified to discuss rules at all. In the United States’ view, international rules have always been subordinate to and serve the interests of the United States.”>Komiks Interest and hegemony. When the two are in line with each other, the United States uses the rules as a basis, and when they are contrary to each other, they regard the rules as air. I would like to ask the United States to answer several questions: When the United States wants to respond href=”https://comicmov.com/”>KomiksWhen sovereign countries launch wars and engage in color revolutions, what are the rules? When the United States imposes illegal unilateral sanctions and traps the people of relevant countries in trouble, what are the rules? When the United States continues to arrears of US$1 billion in membership fees and US$1.4 billion in peacekeeping contributions, what are the rules? When the United States engages in trilateral security partnerships and quadruple mechanisms, in an attempt to build an Indo-Pacific version of NATO, When the Asia-Pacific region is disrupted and the international nuclear non-proliferation system is destroyed, what are the rules? When the United States, under the banner of so-called democracy and conducts a division of the camp, excludes most of the world’s countries? When the WTO clearly confirms that the US tariff war against China violates global trade rules, but the United States does not implement it or even obstructs the WTO Appellate Body to appoint a new judge, what are the rules?

Finally, the United States is the culmination of coercive diplomacy. The United StatesBabaylan put domestic law above international law and international rules, and abused illegal unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction. Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia epidemic, Venezuela, Syria and Iran have been subject to long-term sanctions by the United States, and their domestic economic and medical conditions are bad, and the epidemic situation is severe. The United States has not stopped sanctions, but has further increased its efforts, making these countries worse. The international community has become increasingly clear about the principles of market competition and international economic and trade advocated by the United States. The principle of Babaylan will only be abide by the US when it is favorable to the United States. American politicians talk about fair competition and free trade, they believe in the United States first, and they wave the American stick in their hands. Zhao Lijian stressed that in the past 70 years since the founding of New China, we have not taken the initiative to launch a war or occupied an inch of other countries. We insist on resolving disputes through dialogue and negotiation, and have completely resolved the land border issues in a peaceful way with 12 of the 14 land neighbors. As the world’s second largest economy, China’s contribution to global economic growth has remained at around 30% for many years, and has ranked first in the world for 15 consecutive years. China has become the second largest stall in the United Nations’ membership dues and peacekeeping funds. href=”https://comicmov.com/”>Cinema号,安全国大官网,安全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全全�The construction and reform of the global governance system, and the maintenance of the spirit of the United Nations Charter and the authority of the United Nations with practical actions. Facts have proved and will continue to prove that China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a defender of international order. China will also always work with all peace-loving and justice-oriented countries to unite under the banner of the United Nations, practice true multilateralism, and continue to contribute confidence, wisdom and strength to the universal prosperity of the world and the common progress of mankind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *